<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Supplier-Blog - News and Development &#187; Book Hotel in Amsterdam next week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.getyourguide.com/tag/book-hotel-in-amsterdam-next-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.getyourguide.com</link>
	<description>GetYourGuide.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 20:01:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Semantic Web Searches for Travel Content</title>
		<link>http://blog.getyourguide.com/2009/07/semantic-web-searches-for-travel-content/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.getyourguide.com/2009/07/semantic-web-searches-for-travel-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Johannes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amsterdam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book Hotel in Amsterdam next week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semantic Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.getyourguide.com/?p=357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People have been talking now about the semantic web and how it will revolutionize the search engine businesses for quite a while. Personally, I have not given too much thought on this entire "semantic business", as I have always felt that my searches were quite "unsemantic" and more directed to websites that I already knew]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.getyourguide.com%2F2009%2F07%2Fsemantic-web-searches-for-travel-content%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.getyourguide.com%2F2009%2F07%2Fsemantic-web-searches-for-travel-content%2F&amp;source=getyourguide&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>People have been talking now about the semantic web and how it will revolutionize the search engine businesses for quite a while. Personally, I have not given too much thought on this entire &#8220;semantic search business&#8221;, as I have always felt that my searches were quite &#8220;unsemantic&#8221; and more directed to websites that I already knew (like &#8220;kayak amsterdam&#8221; or &#8220;tripadvisor amsterdam reviews&#8221;). However, I have to admit that my search patterns have changed over the last months and my searches are getting way more complex. Recently I find myself writing or copying entire sentences into Google &#8211; with varying results. Yet, we have the big <a href="http://www.google.com">Google</a> competitor <a href="http://www.bing.com">Bing</a> now on the scene, so today I tried how well both search engines handle &#8220;semantic&#8221; searches in comparison.<span id="more-357"></span>For starters, I tried out a search that is in my opinion very ordinary semantic search and quite important to the online travel industry. I decided to look for a hotel in Amsterdam next week, thus entered &#8220;book hotel in amsterdam next week&#8221;. The result in Google and Bing is quite sobering:</p>
<div id="attachment_359" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.bing.com/search?q=book+hotel+in+amsterdam+next+week&amp;go=&amp;form=QBRE&amp;scope=web&amp;qs=n"><img class="size-medium wp-image-359 " title="Bing Search" src="http://blog.getyourguide.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/picture-1-300x166.png" alt="&quot;Book hotel in Amsterdam next week&quot; in Bing" width="300" height="166" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">&quot;Book hotel in Amsterdam next week&quot; on Bing</p></div>
<div id="attachment_361" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;client=safari&amp;rls=en-us&amp;q=book+hotel+in+amsterdam+next+week&amp;aq=f&amp;oq=&amp;aqi="><img class="size-medium wp-image-361 " title="Google" src="http://blog.getyourguide.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/picture-2-300x164.png" alt="&quot;book hotel in amsterdam next week&quot; on Google" width="300" height="164" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">&quot;Book hotel in amsterdam next week&quot; on Google</p></div>
<p>I don&#8217;t know whether I am too demanding here, but none of the searches are presenting my anything in particular for next week. No special deals, no availability information &#8211; really nothing in particular. I could have just left it out and just searched for &#8220;hotels in amsterdam&#8221;. Even more interesting is that none of the Ads even recognize that I want to go next week and thus promote special deals. I mean really, for all the money hotel websites pay their online marketing agencies, someone could have at least thought about targeted ads concerning dates and times.</p>
<p>Furthermore I thought it was quite interesting how very different hotel companies pop up on either Google or Bing as first results, which once again demonstrates the power of the search engine to specifically promote sites optimized to their standards. It&#8217;s quite funny how Bing ignores Booking.com, which is by far the No.1 hotel platform in Europe by now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.getyourguide.com/2009/07/semantic-web-searches-for-travel-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
