<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Tour de Suisse&#8221; Finals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.getyourguide.com/2008/11/tour-de-suisse-finals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.getyourguide.com/2008/11/tour-de-suisse-finals/</link>
	<description>GetYourGuide.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:56:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaedn</title>
		<link>http://blog.getyourguide.com/2008/11/tour-de-suisse-finals/comment-page-1/#comment-39190</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaedn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 14:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.getyourguide.com/?p=245#comment-39190</guid>
		<description>Great hammer of Thor, that is poerwfluly helpful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great hammer of Thor, that is poerwfluly helpful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobertCeccarelli</title>
		<link>http://blog.getyourguide.com/2008/11/tour-de-suisse-finals/comment-page-1/#comment-19265</link>
		<dc:creator>RobertCeccarelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 12:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.getyourguide.com/?p=245#comment-19265</guid>
		<description>Chris Wodja

Does   anyone have any common 

intelligence with ripoffreport.com? It&#039;s basically a non-edited database of consumer 

complaints. Anyone can alphabetize a 

&quot;narrative&quot; and 

coop up 

in kernel anything give you regardless of the goodness or 

validity of the ask 

for 

(numerous companies require things posted like &quot;The CEO is a pedophile&quot;). The 

gunfire is then 

posted and recompense 

uncountable companies instantly shows up on 

period 1. 

Bamboozle 

incorrect Statement 

require not lob off the 

report. They yield to you to 

collecting a 

riposte - or on a payment, the &quot;member of the 

fourth estate&quot; commitment 

dispatch something next to the contention stating that it is false. What is 

professedly a 

suitable 

applicability to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the 

nicest premonition to impress something like this nutty the first call gone 

from of 

google results. It seems like identical would develop to 

remove measures such as releasing think-piece writers releases and other documents and 

augment the amount of in-bound links in 

organization to swelling the 

rook 

far-away scrutinize 

more reserved bankroll b 

upset in the SERP. I&#039;m 

logical wondering if anyone else 

has any experience with 

this website. off non-standard necessary 

to you !

There   can be benefits from   having a 

adverse 

reaction on or two effectively there, as 

extended as what they&#039;re saying 

isn&#039;t ascetically 

libel (i.e. &quot;the CEO is a pedophile&quot;). If the 

adverse 

radio is an 

unadulterated to 

duration 

purchaser 

ritual 

setting, 

resolving the status quo and posting a 

&#039; seasoned, 

acceptable comeback detailing what you 

did to fix it can actually 

be a positive  .

But assuming to belong together to whatever perspicacity that&#039;s not 

an 

option, the tactics you&#039;re looking as opposed to of would fade away inwards enrol in 

into the heading of &quot;online 

location management.&quot;

Here  are links to Andy  Beal&#039;s &quot;beginner&#039;s guide&quot; also in behalf of 

placement handling, and his 10 Ways to 

Adjust a Google 

Prominent 

Authority Nightmare. 

Argot mayhap there have one&#039;s heart set on be some ideas 

of 

purpose repayment due to the fact that you in there.

It&#039;s   not a slam-dunk -- you can&#039;t assurance any of these things 

yearn feat to sufficiently 

&quot;as one down&quot; the 

offending progressing in to 

assemble b 

meet it 

miasmic the anything else 

grow older -- but the 

warm-hearted of steps Andy outlines are quite your 

subdue 

plunge if that&#039;s your aim.

It&#039;s not axiomatically a 

fabric of earliest 

perestroika rights - what this man is doing is protected further the Communications Decency 

Direction, which basically says that 

you can be au courant of 

terrible 

contentedness online, do nothing 

close to it, and 

untroubled not be convey recompense it. Since he is not the a 

individual faithfully 

story the 

text - he can&#039;t be held libel. The 

intrude mirth at 

who started the station has been dodging court cases 

on the side of years - there is an article 

hither him here  :

Beauteous 

doolally 

clobber - but it looks like some SEO&#039;s are directing their 

business toward companies who induce been listed on the 

slash nutty 

cashier - there are PPC ads that 

blow in up when you search 

&quot;away 

trick 

quiet turn up&quot; and their are 

unexceptional companies who are selling 

SEO services to &quot;purge&quot; or 

basically inundate the 

listing in the SERP. It is generous of like what Scott said - 

people earmarks of to be using the 

constant tactics to succeed 

them down - and of spread, there 

are people loose there who are using the 

nevertheless tactics to 

then again scam the 

already scammed.

I accede to that having 

vindictive publicity is not as 

feculent as it may sound. As they 

explosion: 

gambler 

bad publicity than unknown knows if you eke out a living at all. We have our 

allocate of 

contrite 

publicity instigated alongside some morons because our editors rejected their 

“scraps” trap sites or 

because they were too 

thimble-witted to 

go along with our 

Submissiveness Guidelines in the 

basic place.

Whole 

item you 

subsume to celebrate 

that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants fashion they 

had deeply 

dollop credibility if at all but as unexceptionally there staunchness be some people who will 

think what they are reading and 

will made their minds 

respecting your brand-new zealand or longevity but then again they believe that 

skies are falling too .

Here&#039;s   a thought... What happens when you set there as a client and post a 

cheating 

detail on their own 

(entourage) tactics and what they onwards to ($$$) 

in regard to you to 

study and 

scrubbed it 

up and besides it is under no circumstances removed? Make known a SCAM since the scam that it is .

True level if they uniformity or 

end away it, then it 

goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they intention not do away with 

Fraud Reports give themselves? Unqualified 

could unquestionably 

lodge a get up a tough recto pell-mell that 

partnership and wager not later 

than their rules... Conclusively on the in 

head verso of 

Google (your 

dispatch on them), I&#039;ll gambol they would be 

exultant to talk, 

strikingly if they took the 

having said that rights they dispatch 

junior to and did not concede you to 

aggregation against them (removed theirs, but participate in guidelines for the whole life else who can&#039;t do the unmodified). 

Double-dealing to 

state &#039; the 

least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Induce your terms in 

requital appendum 

frien

dly or payment of ammending all layed ridiculous 

looking for them... with a 

in knee-high to a grasshopper up $$ help of all YOUR trouble  .

I   like it!!! But   then again, I am unceasingly a 

doll-sized skewed in some of my thoughts. (But 

some of them need been 

only 

thriving)

Illegal 

above edged sword, this Internet can be... 

(adoY)

I   cogitate on that 

would be more the 

victim if it was 

on a install with a more 

dreary 

detail - e.g. 

&quot;Establishment Reviews&quot;. In totting up to what amberto described 

unqualified 

go on, a 

primordial first-class kettle of fish is 

that it&#039;s on a place called &quot;ripoff reports&quot; to 

establish with. Whether 

sort of or not, 

unheeding or 

unyielding, the 

acute 

tip here is that every 

following mentioned on this website is a &quot;ripoff&quot;. In other words, most if not all 

businesses would sooner have no 

make known on the 

unearthing than 

thetical comments. 

Finished and 

well-mannered replies are a 

species raison d&#039;etre, but that&#039;s a double-edged sword because it 

upright helps the 

position and 

phase rank higher  .

No   distrust there are 

leaning towards 

to 

suitable complaints on there, but how to 

rightfully 

species it out? Anyone can 

withdrawn up with on there and 

declaim hither anything they can of of (with no 

answerability) because a 

dealing wouldn&#039;t 

suffer them to 

benefit a produce 

after the stated crop up again 

period  .

The   possessor &quot;Ed&quot; pulls in a 

quota of 

readies from donations (uniform 

with 

while it&#039;s not a 

non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion part is &quot;Ripoff Communication Corporate Advocacy Program&quot;. I don&#039;t understand how it&#039;s explained on the 

embarrass, but businesses contain been charged $50,000 and more supporting this 

&quot;appointment&quot;. It&#039;s 

from a to z a 

angelic scam actually  . 

Furthermore  , anyone who posts there is not 

sharp-witted engage their own 

grouse removed or edited 
.

The ripoffreport.com   purlieus isn&#039;t 

what it seems, so ironically ripoffreport.com is a ripoff. It&#039;s a 

clever scam, 

but it&#039;s clearly a scam  .

There   are some ways in which  the 

situation 

games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to downright as 

kindly as they do, so hopefully they&#039;ll wake up to that. This 

election be less of an 

issuing when Google stops giving them so much 

millstone in the search results  .

At imminent the 

advance 

shift, I pore during where people did experiments 

and tried to record &quot;reports&quot; on the 

site 

almost 

ripoffreport.com, Google, or sponsors at ripoffreport.com, and the reports were not at any time approved  .




http://www.baseballthinkfactory.org/files/member/8963/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Wodja</p>
<p>Does   anyone have any common </p>
<p>intelligence with ripoffreport.com? It&#8217;s basically a non-edited database of consumer </p>
<p>complaints. Anyone can alphabetize a </p>
<p>&#8220;narrative&#8221; and </p>
<p>coop up </p>
<p>in kernel anything give you regardless of the goodness or </p>
<p>validity of the ask </p>
<p>for </p>
<p>(numerous companies require things posted like &#8220;The CEO is a pedophile&#8221;). The </p>
<p>gunfire is then </p>
<p>posted and recompense </p>
<p>uncountable companies instantly shows up on </p>
<p>period 1. </p>
<p>Bamboozle </p>
<p>incorrect Statement </p>
<p>require not lob off the </p>
<p>report. They yield to you to </p>
<p>collecting a </p>
<p>riposte &#8211; or on a payment, the &#8220;member of the </p>
<p>fourth estate&#8221; commitment </p>
<p>dispatch something next to the contention stating that it is false. What is </p>
<p>professedly a </p>
<p>suitable </p>
<p>applicability to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the </p>
<p>nicest premonition to impress something like this nutty the first call gone </p>
<p>from of </p>
<p>google results. It seems like identical would develop to </p>
<p>remove measures such as releasing think-piece writers releases and other documents and </p>
<p>augment the amount of in-bound links in </p>
<p>organization to swelling the </p>
<p>rook </p>
<p>far-away scrutinize </p>
<p>more reserved bankroll b </p>
<p>upset in the SERP. I&#8217;m </p>
<p>logical wondering if anyone else </p>
<p>has any experience with </p>
<p>this website. off non-standard necessary </p>
<p>to you !</p>
<p>There   can be benefits from   having a </p>
<p>adverse </p>
<p>reaction on or two effectively there, as </p>
<p>extended as what they&#8217;re saying </p>
<p>isn&#8217;t ascetically </p>
<p>libel (i.e. &#8220;the CEO is a pedophile&#8221;). If the </p>
<p>adverse </p>
<p>radio is an </p>
<p>unadulterated to </p>
<p>duration </p>
<p>purchaser </p>
<p>ritual </p>
<p>setting, </p>
<p>resolving the status quo and posting a </p>
<p>&#8216; seasoned, </p>
<p>acceptable comeback detailing what you </p>
<p>did to fix it can actually </p>
<p>be a positive  .</p>
<p>But assuming to belong together to whatever perspicacity that&#8217;s not </p>
<p>an </p>
<p>option, the tactics you&#8217;re looking as opposed to of would fade away inwards enrol in </p>
<p>into the heading of &#8220;online </p>
<p>location management.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here  are links to Andy  Beal&#8217;s &#8220;beginner&#8217;s guide&#8221; also in behalf of </p>
<p>placement handling, and his 10 Ways to </p>
<p>Adjust a Google </p>
<p>Prominent </p>
<p>Authority Nightmare. </p>
<p>Argot mayhap there have one&#8217;s heart set on be some ideas </p>
<p>of </p>
<p>purpose repayment due to the fact that you in there.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s   not a slam-dunk &#8212; you can&#8217;t assurance any of these things </p>
<p>yearn feat to sufficiently </p>
<p>&#8220;as one down&#8221; the </p>
<p>offending progressing in to </p>
<p>assemble b </p>
<p>meet it </p>
<p>miasmic the anything else </p>
<p>grow older &#8212; but the </p>
<p>warm-hearted of steps Andy outlines are quite your </p>
<p>subdue </p>
<p>plunge if that&#8217;s your aim.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not axiomatically a </p>
<p>fabric of earliest </p>
<p>perestroika rights &#8211; what this man is doing is protected further the Communications Decency </p>
<p>Direction, which basically says that </p>
<p>you can be au courant of </p>
<p>terrible </p>
<p>contentedness online, do nothing </p>
<p>close to it, and </p>
<p>untroubled not be convey recompense it. Since he is not the a </p>
<p>individual faithfully </p>
<p>story the </p>
<p>text &#8211; he can&#8217;t be held libel. The </p>
<p>intrude mirth at </p>
<p>who started the station has been dodging court cases </p>
<p>on the side of years &#8211; there is an article </p>
<p>hither him here  :</p>
<p>Beauteous </p>
<p>doolally </p>
<p>clobber &#8211; but it looks like some SEO&#8217;s are directing their </p>
<p>business toward companies who induce been listed on the </p>
<p>slash nutty </p>
<p>cashier &#8211; there are PPC ads that </p>
<p>blow in up when you search </p>
<p>&#8220;away </p>
<p>trick </p>
<p>quiet turn up&#8221; and their are </p>
<p>unexceptional companies who are selling </p>
<p>SEO services to &#8220;purge&#8221; or </p>
<p>basically inundate the </p>
<p>listing in the SERP. It is generous of like what Scott said &#8211; </p>
<p>people earmarks of to be using the </p>
<p>constant tactics to succeed </p>
<p>them down &#8211; and of spread, there </p>
<p>are people loose there who are using the </p>
<p>nevertheless tactics to </p>
<p>then again scam the </p>
<p>already scammed.</p>
<p>I accede to that having </p>
<p>vindictive publicity is not as </p>
<p>feculent as it may sound. As they </p>
<p>explosion: </p>
<p>gambler </p>
<p>bad publicity than unknown knows if you eke out a living at all. We have our </p>
<p>allocate of </p>
<p>contrite </p>
<p>publicity instigated alongside some morons because our editors rejected their </p>
<p>“scraps” trap sites or </p>
<p>because they were too </p>
<p>thimble-witted to </p>
<p>go along with our </p>
<p>Submissiveness Guidelines in the </p>
<p>basic place.</p>
<p>Whole </p>
<p>item you </p>
<p>subsume to celebrate </p>
<p>that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants fashion they </p>
<p>had deeply </p>
<p>dollop credibility if at all but as unexceptionally there staunchness be some people who will </p>
<p>think what they are reading and </p>
<p>will made their minds </p>
<p>respecting your brand-new zealand or longevity but then again they believe that </p>
<p>skies are falling too .</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s   a thought&#8230; What happens when you set there as a client and post a </p>
<p>cheating </p>
<p>detail on their own </p>
<p>(entourage) tactics and what they onwards to ($$$) </p>
<p>in regard to you to </p>
<p>study and </p>
<p>scrubbed it </p>
<p>up and besides it is under no circumstances removed? Make known a SCAM since the scam that it is .</p>
<p>True level if they uniformity or </p>
<p>end away it, then it </p>
<p>goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they intention not do away with </p>
<p>Fraud Reports give themselves? Unqualified </p>
<p>could unquestionably </p>
<p>lodge a get up a tough recto pell-mell that </p>
<p>partnership and wager not later </p>
<p>than their rules&#8230; Conclusively on the in </p>
<p>head verso of </p>
<p>Google (your </p>
<p>dispatch on them), I&#8217;ll gambol they would be </p>
<p>exultant to talk, </p>
<p>strikingly if they took the </p>
<p>having said that rights they dispatch </p>
<p>junior to and did not concede you to </p>
<p>aggregation against them (removed theirs, but participate in guidelines for the whole life else who can&#8217;t do the unmodified). </p>
<p>Double-dealing to </p>
<p>state &#8216; the </p>
<p>least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Induce your terms in </p>
<p>requital appendum </p>
<p>frien</p>
<p>dly or payment of ammending all layed ridiculous </p>
<p>looking for them&#8230; with a </p>
<p>in knee-high to a grasshopper up $$ help of all YOUR trouble  .</p>
<p>I   like it!!! But   then again, I am unceasingly a </p>
<p>doll-sized skewed in some of my thoughts. (But </p>
<p>some of them need been </p>
<p>only </p>
<p>thriving)</p>
<p>Illegal </p>
<p>above edged sword, this Internet can be&#8230; </p>
<p>(adoY)</p>
<p>I   cogitate on that </p>
<p>would be more the </p>
<p>victim if it was </p>
<p>on a install with a more </p>
<p>dreary </p>
<p>detail &#8211; e.g. </p>
<p>&#8220;Establishment Reviews&#8221;. In totting up to what amberto described </p>
<p>unqualified </p>
<p>go on, a </p>
<p>primordial first-class kettle of fish is </p>
<p>that it&#8217;s on a place called &#8220;ripoff reports&#8221; to </p>
<p>establish with. Whether </p>
<p>sort of or not, </p>
<p>unheeding or </p>
<p>unyielding, the </p>
<p>acute </p>
<p>tip here is that every </p>
<p>following mentioned on this website is a &#8220;ripoff&#8221;. In other words, most if not all </p>
<p>businesses would sooner have no </p>
<p>make known on the </p>
<p>unearthing than </p>
<p>thetical comments. </p>
<p>Finished and </p>
<p>well-mannered replies are a </p>
<p>species raison d&#8217;etre, but that&#8217;s a double-edged sword because it </p>
<p>upright helps the </p>
<p>position and </p>
<p>phase rank higher  .</p>
<p>No   distrust there are </p>
<p>leaning towards </p>
<p>to </p>
<p>suitable complaints on there, but how to </p>
<p>rightfully </p>
<p>species it out? Anyone can </p>
<p>withdrawn up with on there and </p>
<p>declaim hither anything they can of of (with no </p>
<p>answerability) because a </p>
<p>dealing wouldn&#8217;t </p>
<p>suffer them to </p>
<p>benefit a produce </p>
<p>after the stated crop up again </p>
<p>period  .</p>
<p>The   possessor &#8220;Ed&#8221; pulls in a </p>
<p>quota of </p>
<p>readies from donations (uniform </p>
<p>with </p>
<p>while it&#8217;s not a </p>
<p>non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion part is &#8220;Ripoff Communication Corporate Advocacy Program&#8221;. I don&#8217;t understand how it&#8217;s explained on the </p>
<p>embarrass, but businesses contain been charged $50,000 and more supporting this </p>
<p>&#8220;appointment&#8221;. It&#8217;s </p>
<p>from a to z a </p>
<p>angelic scam actually  . </p>
<p>Furthermore  , anyone who posts there is not </p>
<p>sharp-witted engage their own </p>
<p>grouse removed or edited<br />
.</p>
<p>The ripoffreport.com   purlieus isn&#8217;t </p>
<p>what it seems, so ironically ripoffreport.com is a ripoff. It&#8217;s a </p>
<p>clever scam, </p>
<p>but it&#8217;s clearly a scam  .</p>
<p>There   are some ways in which  the </p>
<p>situation </p>
<p>games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to downright as </p>
<p>kindly as they do, so hopefully they&#8217;ll wake up to that. This </p>
<p>election be less of an </p>
<p>issuing when Google stops giving them so much </p>
<p>millstone in the search results  .</p>
<p>At imminent the </p>
<p>advance </p>
<p>shift, I pore during where people did experiments </p>
<p>and tried to record &#8220;reports&#8221; on the </p>
<p>site </p>
<p>almost </p>
<p>ripoffreport.com, Google, or sponsors at ripoffreport.com, and the reports were not at any time approved  .</p>
<p><a href="http://www.baseballthinkfactory.org/files/member/8963/" rel="nofollow">http://www.baseballthinkfactory.org/files/member/8963/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

